Rhetorical Criticism of the United Express Flight 3411 Incident: Examining Persuasive Strategies and Implications.I have attached a paper full of directions and the full description of how this paper should be written. I have also attached my previous artifact paper to use and refer too ,while you write this final paper. The artifact I choose is “Case Study: United Express Flight 3411 Incident Passenger Removal Incident” Take a good look at the papers attached.

QUESTION

I have attached a paper full of directions and the full description of how this paper should be written.
I have also attached my previous artifact paper to use and refer too ,while you write this final paper.
The artifact I choose is “Case Study: United Express Flight 3411 Incident Passenger Removal Incident”
Take a good look at the papers attached.

This paper will be a final opportunity to showcase my skills at applying principles of rhetorical criticism to a rhetorical artifact of your choosing. In short, it is a full-blown work of criticism. It provides an interpretive argument about the artifact(s) you have chosen, and it integrates the previous essays and new development of your thinking about your artifact. This paper draws heavily on earlier work but does not simply string previous papers together. Rather, your earlier analyses are creatively blended into a complete, polished piece of criticism.

ANSWER

 Rhetorical Criticism of the United Express Flight 3411 Incident: Examining Persuasive Strategies and Implications

Introduction

The United Express Flight 3411 incident involving the forceful removal of a passenger has become a notable rhetorical artifact that warrants a comprehensive analysis. This paper serves as a final opportunity to apply principles of rhetorical criticism to this incident, providing an interpretive argument that integrates previous essays and further develops insights. By examining the persuasive strategies employed and their implications, this work of criticism aims to shed light on the rhetoric surrounding the incident.

Background and Context

The United Express Flight 3411 incident took place on April 9, 2017, when a passenger was forcibly removed from an overbooked flight. This incident gained widespread attention through video footage capturing the passenger’s removal and subsequent public outcry. It is essential to understand the historical and cultural context surrounding the incident, including public attitudes toward airline practices, customer service expectations, and social media’s role in amplifying the incident’s impact.

Summary and Analysis of Previous Essays

In previous essays, various aspects of the United Express Flight 3411 incident have been examined, such as the persuasive appeals used, audience responses, and ethical considerations. These analyses have provided insights into the rhetoric employed by the airline, the passenger, and the public. In this final paper, these earlier analyses will be creatively integrated, building upon them to offer a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the incident.

Development of Interpretive Argument

The interpretive argument surrounding the United Express Flight 3411 incident centers on the persuasive strategies employed by the airline and their implications. By applying rhetorical theories and concepts, such as ethos, pathos, and logos, the paper explores how the airline attempted to justify its actions and manage the public fallout. This analysis also delves into the ways in which the passenger and the public responded, examining the persuasive tactics employed in shaping public opinion and seeking accountability.

Integration of Previous Analyses

The previous analyses serve as foundational elements for the development of the interpretive argument. Insights gained from examining the appeals, rhetorical devices, and communication strategies employed by various actors involved in the incident are creatively blended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the rhetoric at play. Connections between different aspects of the incident and the persuasive approaches used are highlighted, contributing to a more nuanced analysis.

Evaluation of Strengths and Limitations

The strengths and limitations of the persuasive strategies employed by the airline, the passenger, and the public are critically assessed. Ethical considerations, cultural implications, and consequences of the rhetoric used are carefully evaluated. By considering the effectiveness of the persuasive appeals, the paper examines how the rhetoric influenced public perception, the reputation of the airline, and the broader discourse on customer service practices within the airline industry.

Intended and Unintended Consequences

The intended and unintended consequences of the rhetoric surrounding the United Express Flight 3411 incident are explored. Positive consequences may include increased awareness of overbooking policies and passenger rights, leading to changes in industry practices. Negative consequences may involve reputational damage, public mistrust, and the perpetuation of a culture of confrontation. By analyzing these consequences, a comprehensive understanding of the incident’s impact can be obtained.

Recommendations for Further Consideration

Based on the analysis of the incident, recommendations can be made to address any identified inequities or shortcomings. These may involve enhancing customer service practices, improving crisis communication strategies, and promoting transparency and accountability within the airline industry. By implementing these recommendations, the incident’s aftermath can contribute to broader discussions on ethical conduct, passenger rights, and corporate responsibility.

Conclusion

The comprehensive analysis of the United Express Flight 3411 incident through a rhetorical criticism lens highlights the persuasive strategies employed by various actors and their implications. By creatively integrating previous essays and developing new insights, this work of criticism offers a nuanced understanding of the rhetoric surrounding the incident. The evaluation of strengths and limitations, exploration of consequences, and recommendations for further consideration contribute to a broader discourse on airline practices and the importance of effective communication in mitigating crises.