Ethical Dilemmas and Autonomy Violations.We are almost there. The next activity is number 6. The activity ask for several things including: 1. Explain Coca-Cola entrepreneurial global strategy elements according to Melinda Gates 2. Briefly describe the Business Plan components 3. Briefly describe the Business Model Canvas components

QUESTION

We are almost there. The next activity is number 6. The activity ask for several things including:
1. Explain Coca-Cola entrepreneurial global strategy elements according to Melinda Gates
2. Briefly describe the Business Plan components
3. Briefly describe the Business Model Canvas components
4. Briefly describe the Value Proposition Canvas componets

Instructions: This activity has two parts. First (a) Discuss how Coca-Cola’s marketing team uses real data, knowledge about local entrepreneurs’ talent, and marketing to access global markets? Second (b) briefly describe each of the different components or sections of:

1. Business Plan
2. Business Model canvas
3. Value Proposition Canvas

Instructions:
1. Answer in Spanish or English, maximun 350 words
2. Times Roman, 12pts, doble space
3. See the video “Melinda Gates: What nonprofits can learn from Coca-Cola” http://www.ted.com/talks/melinda_french_gates_what_nonprofits_can_learn_from_coca_cola?language
4. See the video Business Model Canvas Explained https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoAOzMTLP5s
5. See the video Value Proposition Canvas explained through the Uber example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiWkRiynPAo
6. Find information in the Internet about Coca-Cola worldwide entrepreneurial strategy
7. Find information in the Internet and the course contenet about:
a) business plan
b) business model canvas
c) value proposition canvas
8. Please include five (10) references
9. Email the word document trough the course email on blackboard

ANSWER

Ethical Dilemmas and Autonomy Violations: A Case Analysis

Introduction

This essay examines the ethical case presented in “A Case for Ethics” and explores the violations of autonomy, the motivations behind Ms. Jenson’s actions, the impact on the family, possible actions for the family, and the recommended course of action for the clinic administrator. Through a comprehensive analysis, we aim to shed light on the ethical complexities of the case.

Violations of Autonomy

Several violations of autonomy are evident in this case. Firstly, the family’s right to informed consent was compromised when Ms. Jenson failed to provide accurate and comprehensive information about the genetic test results. This lack of transparency limited the family’s ability to make fully autonomous decisions regarding their reproductive choices. Additionally, Ms. Jenson’s unauthorized phone call violated the family’s privacy and autonomy by bypassing their right to control their personal medical information.

Ms. Jenson’s Motivation

Ms. Jenson made the telephone call out of a perceived moral obligation to the unborn child and her personal conviction that she needed to prevent potential harm. She acted with good intentions, aiming to advocate for the child’s well-being. However, her decision to breach confidentiality and undermine the family’s autonomy raises significant ethical concerns.

 Impact on the Family

The family was negatively affected by Ms. Jenson’s actions. They experienced a breach of trust and privacy, which can lead to emotional distress and a loss of confidence in healthcare providers. The family’s ability to make informed decisions about their reproductive options was compromised, and they were denied the opportunity to process the sensitive information in a supportive and controlled environment.

 Possible Actions for the Family

In this situation, the family has several options. Firstly, they could seek legal advice to address the violation of privacy and breach of confidentiality. They may also choose to file a complaint with the appropriate regulatory body, holding Ms. Jenson accountable for her actions. Furthermore, the family could pursue counseling or therapy to navigate the emotional implications of the case and develop coping mechanisms for the distress caused.

 Recommended Action as Clinic Administrator

As the administrator of the clinic, it is essential to address this ethical breach promptly and effectively. The recommended action is as follows:

Conduct an investigation: Initiate an internal investigation to gather all the relevant facts and obtain statements from the involved parties, ensuring a fair and unbiased assessment.

Implement disciplinary measures: If the investigation confirms the ethical violation, disciplinary action should be taken against Ms. Jenson, ensuring that appropriate consequences are imposed to deter similar behavior in the future.

 Provide support and apology to the family: The clinic should extend a sincere apology to the family, acknowledging the breach of confidentiality and the emotional distress caused. Additionally, the clinic should offer counseling or support services to assist the family in coping with the situation.

Strengthen policies and procedures: Review and update existing policies and procedures regarding patient confidentiality and informed consent to prevent similar violations in the future. Enhance staff training on ethical considerations and reinforce the importance of respecting patient autonomy.

Conclusion

The case analysis highlights the violations of autonomy, the impact on the family, and the ethical complexities involved. It is crucial for healthcare professionals to prioritize patient autonomy, informed consent, and privacy. In this case, appropriate action must be taken to address the breach of confidentiality, provide support to the affected family, and reinforce ethical standards within the clinic. By doing so, the clinic can uphold its commitment to patient autonomy, trust, and ethical conduct.