Explanations and Rubric for the two essays on the Joseon Dynasty/ Deep Roots
Choose two of the three prompts. Clearly label the prompt at the top of the essay. Submit both essays in one document with one bibliography. These are the prompts:
a. One drama episode analyzed very deeply to connect it to things we learned
b. One historical inaccuracy, what would be accurate, why you think that inaccuracy appears in the drama.
c. One theme in the drama or one aspect of life in pre-modern Korea (ex. Food, class, education) and go into details about everything you know on that topic.
do not substantially overlap what you write in your two essays (a little overlap is natural).
For example, if you are doing a deep reading of one episode, and are investigating the topic of food, it would be best to say “this episode also has two scenes where the characters are eating, but I will be addressing that in my other essay.”
extensively demonstrate your familiarity with class readings. Please note that 42 out of 100 points are based on your bibliography and citations. You’ve (theoretically) read at least two articles per week all semester. Use as many of them as possible. You’ve (theoretically) learned how to put correct in-text citations into your paragraphs, and how to make correct Chicago bibliographies. This is like giving you free points.
bring in outside readings such as the optional readings if you want, but it is not required. Only academic readings are worth citing in this assignment. Something like Wikipedia would not be appropriate. It may be a place to start your own investigation, but only journal articles and academic books/book chapters are needed for this assignment. If you need more readings on topic X, please check the optional readings, and then if you still need more, you can also ask me for help. There is no strict rule on how many of your sources are for each of the two essays.
clearly state the point of your essay in the introduction of the essay (in the introduction to both essays). Especially for option B (see above) you need an argument. Clearly state what is inaccurate. Then prove it by using lots of great references. (“I argue that —__ is unrealistic for early Joseon Korea, because X, Y, and Z.”) If you’re unsure about your argument, run it by members of your group and by me.
Total length: 2,400-3,000 words. Required length per essay: 800 words. (Therefore you may write two essays of 1,500 words, or one essay of 800 and one essay of 1,600, or one of 900 and one of 2,100à you get the idea, right?). Bibliography (and any headings, titles, etc.) is not counted in your words.
Bibliography. Absolute minimum of 10 academic sources for the two essays. Hwang book counts only once.
Perfect Chicago format (if you got this right in the discussions, just copy and paste!)
-1 for each error. If you have less than 10 academic entries, -2 for each absent (ex. -4 points if only 8 academic sources).
Sources have been used as in-text citations to support the points made in the paper. Points lost for stating things that need to be supported without any citation, & for summarizing the ideas of others, without citations, in such a way that it implies it is the student’s idea.
Sources have not been used in a way that overwhelms the students own voice and analysis (such as ending a paragraph with a quote that you use to speak for you).
The citations have been formatted correctly and integrated smoothly into the paper à ex. (Smith and Jones 2020, 75) or (Yang 2020: 75)
Romanization. A couple mistakes in names of characters or a couple words will be noted but ignored. If there are repeated Romanization errors, and the student has demonstrated a lack of concern for the importance of Romanization (perpetuating the same mistakes others have made), then these points will quickly disappear. An example of student concern for Romanization would be the use of [brackets] to include correct Romanization along with the Romanization used in something the student is quoting.
Of course students who are not Korean and do not know Korean will be given more leeway when they trust the Romanization in articles they read than Korean students who can easily Romanize correctly because they know the Korean original. [Students who can type in Korean are urged to use the Romanization converter]
Font is TNR or Calibri. Font size is 12 or 11
Margins are standard, except for block quotes which are indented
2,500-3,000 words of text and footnotes (not including bibliography) (losing points over or under the word limit)
The drama has been used effectively to illustrate one or both of the essays, with reference to the episode and even the timestamp (ep. 9, 12:23-12:51) where quoted dialogue occurs.
The paper has been submitted by the deadline
The argument is convincing (due to the clear support provided in the paper, not b/c of the citations, but the ideas). After I read this paper I said “wow, you’re right, this DOES prove XXXXX.”
The argument was easy to locate and did not need editing to sound like a real argument
There are no over-generalizations (using Confucianism too generally, making broad blanket statements about Korea that should be tempered by modifiers such as “often” or “in many cases,” but are not)
Part of this convincing paper is that it is well organized. There might be section headings. There might be signposting “In this section I will discuss…” “There are three main reasons…”
There are definitely multiple paragraphs.
The analysis is original. This student has contributed something new—bringing new clarity, new insight, and bringing ideas into conversation in new ways. These points should be among the hardest points to earn.
Less than 7 points is a lack of clarity is just holding back your ideas, or are they even yours, I can’t tell, it’s not clear. Approx. 7 points is heading in the right direction, here and there are good points, you could rewrite this and really improve it, though. 15 points means you blew my mind, are you sure you’re an undergrad.
Plagiarism Free Papers
All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.
All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.
A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.
Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.
Originality & Security
At Homework Valley, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.
24/7 Customer Support
Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
We work around the clock to see best customer experience.
Our prices are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.
Admission help & Client-Writer Contact
When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.
We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.
Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.