The articles I have assigned all deal with the involvement of anthropologists in the armed forces of the United States and Canada operating in Iraq and Afghanistan. The US called it the “Human Terrain System”; the Canadian Armed Forces called it “White Situational Awareness Team”. In both cases, it was an effort to integrate anthropologists (or cultural ‘coaching’) into the decision structures of troops on the ground. The hope was that it would make those decisions, and the military personnel who would implement them, more aware of the cultural values of the people they were dealing with. The intent was to ‘win hearts and minds’ and reduce civilian casualties by promoting cultural awareness and sensitivity.
Anthropology has long been uncomfortable with the discipline’s past associations with colonial administrations. More recently, American anthropology has forbidden involvements with any military in its ethics code, due to their experiences in the Vietnam War (read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Camelot if you want to know more). The revival of this in the ‘war on terror’ was also seen as unethical. Making the invaders of Afghanistan and Iraq more culturally sensitive really did not make them any less, well, invaders. This criticism was mirrored in that of the ethics and objectivity of embedded journalists.
The style of the paper will be an argumentative essay. You will be taking a position early and attempting to argue or prove it in the paper. Your task, once again, is to assess the points made in each of the articles, and the data used to support them. You are then to provide your own, reasoned and supported, views on whether the articles argue their positions successfully. Many of the authors are critical of the initiatives, but there is also some supporting material. Quite effective arguments exist on either side.
If you think this was a good idea, state this and explain what you see as the advantages and benefits of the initiative. If you feel that this practice was a bad idea, state that up front and explain what you feel are the major problems with it. If you cannot argue strongly on either side and think it is some of both, explain why.
Remember that you are assessing their arguments to make an argument of your own, and that your argument is the one that interests me the most. Do not waste my time simply repeating what they said. Decide what position you will take and then concentrate on extracting the points from those articles that will support your argument.
You will be assessed on:
Format (marks will be deducted if you do not follow these instructions)
The paper should be 700-1000 words (2-3 pages), double spaced with 1”/25cm margins all around, and in 12pt Times New Roman font. No title page, headers, and footers. APA citation and bibliography are required.
You must upload a copy in MS Office .doc or .docx format or PDF format (and no other format) to the Brightspace folder Assignment 2 by 9PM Wednesday March 3rd.
Potential Sources (Cite any 4)
Below are six sources. Some are supportive, some are critical of embedding anthropologists. You are required to choose any 4 to support your paper. You can use more from this list or any others that you find as well. There is some discussion about ethical research in your text, which may be useful. But 4 from below is the minimum required.
Please remember that these links may not be openable in one browser but will be in another. Try different browsers and different machines before emailing me that you are having problems. Please do not wait until the night before to discover these problems.
Plagiarism Free Papers
All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.
All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.
A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.
Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.
Originality & Security
At Homework Valley, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.
24/7 Customer Support
Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
We work around the clock to see best customer experience.
Our prices are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.
Admission help & Client-Writer Contact
When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.
We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.
Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.