Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology

The text discusses “Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology” in Chapter 2. As a student, you sociologically view the world in a particular way. Do you see society as a system where all the various parts work together to keep the system functioning smoothly (structural functionalism), or do you see society as a place where various groups are struggling for power and influence in competition with other groups (conflict theory)? Perhaps you see the world primarily as a place that is about relationships between people and how people understand each other and understand what is expected of them in different situations (symbolic interactionism).
Write an essay (750-1,000 words) that addresses the following:
Define and explain the three ways to view the world “sociologically.”
Identify which sociological perspective (structural functionalism, conflict theory, or symbolic interactionism) most closely represents your view of the world.
Describe the factors that have caused you to view the world through that perspective, such as personal experience in our society, popular culture, media, etc.
Use an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of your theory.
Briefly explain why you did not choose each of the other two perspectives being careful to demonstrate that you understand the other perspectives.
You must use a minimum of three scholarly sources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

No of Criteria: 9 Achievement Levels: 5
Criteria
Achievement Levels
DescriptionPercentage
Unsatisfactory
0.00 %
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00 %
Satisfactory
75.00 %
Good
85.00 %
Excellent
100.00 %
Content
70.0

Define and explain the three ways to view the world sociologically.
10.0
Paper fails to or incorrectly defines and explains the three ways to view the world sociologically.
Paper inadequately defines and explains the three ways to view the world sociologically. Explanation is weak and missing evidence to support claims.
Paper adequately defines and explains the three ways to view the world sociologically. Explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims.
Paper clearly defines and explains the three ways to view the world sociologically. Explanation is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims.
Paper thoroughly defines and explains the three ways to view the world sociologically, with quality details and well-researched evidence. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims.
Identify which sociological perspective (structural functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism) most closely represents your view of the world. Describe the factors that have caused you to view the world through that perspective, such as personal experience in our society, popular culture, media, etc.
30.0
Paper fails to identify which sociological perspective most closely represents the student’s view of the world.
Paper inadequately identifies which sociological perspective most closely represents the student’s view of the world. Description of the factors that caused the student to view the world through this perspective is weak and missing logical connections.
Paper adequately identifies which sociological perspective most closely represents the student’s view of the world. Description of the factors that caused the student to view the world through this perspective is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity.
Paper clearly identifies which sociological perspective most closely represents the student’s view of the world. Description of the factors that caused the student to view the world through this perspective is strong and sound.
Paper thoroughly identifies which sociological perspective most closely represents the student’s view of the world. Description of the factors that caused the student to view the world through this perspective is comprehensive and insightful.
In addition, use an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of your theory.
20.0
Paper fails to use an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of the theory.
Paper inadequately uses an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of the theory.
Paper adequately uses an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of the theory.
Paper clearly uses an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of the theory.
Paper thoroughly uses an example from world events that demonstrates evidence of the theory.
Briefly explain why you did not choose each of the other two perspectives being careful to demonstrate that you understand the other perspectives.
10.0
No explanation why student did not choose each of the other two perspectives.
Explanation of why student did not choose each of the other two perspectives is weak and missing logical connections.
Explanation of why student did not choose each of the other two perspectives is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity.
Explanation of why student did not choose each of the other two perspectives is strong and sound.
Explanation of why student did not choose each of the other two perspectives is comprehensive and insightful.
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0

Thesis Development and Purpose
10.0
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Paragraph Development and Transitions
5.0
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
There is a skillful construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format
10.0

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5.0
Appropriate template is not used or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
5.0
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Total Percentage 100
you can find scholarly articles on the GCU website if you need any help contact me.
http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2015/our-social-world_an-introduction-to-sociology_ebook_1e.php my professors book on sociology. you can look at it for references