Did Gerald Ford “do the right thing” when he pardoned Richard Nixon?.The Ethical Dilemma of Gerald Ford’s Pardon of Richard Nixon

QUESTION

topic : Did Gerald Ford “do the right thing” when he pardoned Richard Nixon?
• Typed, double-spaced
• 1” margins on all sides
• 12 pt., Times New Roman font
• At least THREE pieces of evidence
• At least TWO sources
• parenthetical references

ANSWER

The Ethical Dilemma of Gerald Ford’s Pardon of Richard Nixon

Introduction

The pardon of Richard Nixon by President Gerald Ford remains a significant and controversial event in American political history. This paper will examine the ethical dilemma surrounding Ford’s decision to pardon Nixon and analyze whether it can be considered as “doing the right thing.” By exploring the context, motivations, and consequences of the pardon, we can gain insights into the ethical implications of this pivotal moment in American governance.

Background and Context

Gerald Ford assumed the presidency during a time of national turmoil following the Watergate scandal, which led to Richard Nixon’s resignation. The nation was deeply divided, and the public demanded justice and accountability for Nixon’s actions. In this backdrop, Ford faced the challenging decision of whether to pardon his predecessor.

The Ethical Dilemma

The pardon of Richard Nixon presented a complex ethical dilemma for Gerald Ford. On one hand, Ford argued that a prolonged legal battle against Nixon would further divide the country and impede its healing process. On the other hand, pardoning Nixon raised concerns about accountability, fairness, and the potential undermining of the rule of law.

Ethical Analysis

Utilitarian Perspective
From a utilitarian standpoint, Ford’s pardon could be viewed as a means to promote national unity and move the country forward. By sparing the nation from a lengthy and divisive trial, Ford aimed to prioritize the greater good and avoid further political turmoil.

Deontological Perspective

From a deontological perspective, critics argue that Ford’s pardon compromised the principle of accountability and the rule of law. The act of pardoning could be seen as an ethical violation since it potentially allowed Nixon to evade punishment for his actions, sending a message that those in power are above the law.

Virtue Ethics Perspective

The virtue ethics perspective encourages us to examine Ford’s character and motivations. Supporters argue that Ford acted out of genuine concern for the nation’s well-being, displaying virtues such as compassion, forgiveness, and statesmanship. Critics contend that Ford’s decision was politically motivated and aimed at protecting his own reputation.

Conclusion

Determining whether Gerald Ford “did the right thing” in pardoning Richard Nixon is a complex matter with no clear-cut answer. The ethical analysis reveals conflicting perspectives rooted in utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. While the pardon may have contributed to short-term stability and healing, it also raised concerns about accountability and the integrity of the legal system.

Ultimately, the evaluation of Ford’s decision depends on individual values and beliefs regarding the balance between justice, unity, and the preservation of democratic institutions. The ongoing debates surrounding the Nixon pardon serve as a reminder of the enduring ethical questions surrounding political leadership and the complexities of decision-making in times of crisis.