Explain the main topic/question of the article. Explain and identify mandatory indirect benefits addressed in the article. Discuss factors to consider in determining how to offer and select benefits according to the article.

QUESTION

After reading the article, compose your critique by addressing the items listed below.

• Explain the main topic/question of the article.
• Explain and identify mandatory indirect benefits addressed in the article.
• Discuss factors to consider in determining how to offer and select benefits according to the article.
• Take what you have learned from the article, and apply the concepts to your life by explaining whether you support mandatory indirect benefits and describing how they can affect you.

Your critique should be at least two pages in length, not counting the title page and the references page. The critique should include at least two sources—one being the article and one being another credible source. Be sure that any citations or references are in proper APA format.

I have attached a guide and the article that is being referenced.

Beller, M. D. (2014). Mandated benefits, good or bad? At N.Y. hearing, reviews are mixed. Insurance Advocate, 19.

ANSWER

 Explain the main topic/question of the article

Start your critique by providing a brief overview of the main topic or question that the article addresses. Summarize the central theme or argument that the author presents.

 Explain and identify mandatory indirect benefits addressed in the article

Discuss the mandatory indirect benefits discussed in the article. Analyze how the author presents and supports these benefits. Identify specific examples or evidence provided by the author to illustrate the impact of these benefits.

Discuss factors to consider in determining how to offer and select benefits according to the article

Examine the factors discussed in the article that are relevant for determining how to offer and select benefits. Discuss the author’s perspective on these factors and analyze the reasoning behind their recommendations. Consider aspects such as cost-effectiveness, employee preferences, legal requirements, and organizational goals.

Apply the concepts to your life and express your opinion

Reflect on the concepts and arguments presented in the article and consider how they relate to your own experiences or beliefs. Share whether you support mandatory indirect benefits or not, and explain your reasons. Discuss how these benefits, if implemented, could potentially affect you personally or within a professional context.

 Provide supporting sources

Include at least two sources to support your critique—one being the article itself and another credible source. Use proper APA format for in-text citations and include a references page at the end of your critique.

Remember to structure your critique with an introduction, body paragraphs addressing each point, and a conclusion that summarizes your main points and provides a final evaluation or opinion. Make sure to critically analyze the article, present your own perspective, and support your arguments with evidence and credible sources.