Whose decision (Christine Pelton or the school board) do you support? Why? What do you think about the comment one parent made in the actual TV segment-“my child didn’t intend to cheat.” Can a person do something wrong without having intent?Explain.
QUESTION
Please read the following online article: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/31/48hours/main510772.shtml
Please respond to the following questions in a well-written reaction paper. The paper should contain paragraphs, not short answers to questions. – 2 pages!!
Whose decision (Christine Pelton or the school board) do you support? Why?
What do you think about the comment one parent made in the actual TV segment-“my child didn’t intend to cheat.” Can a person do something wrong without having intent?Explain.
What do you think about the student who says, “Cheating is almost not wrong” and “it’s any way that you can get an advantage”? Would you care if this were the pilot of the next plane you boarded? How about your brain surgeon?
In this case: How did academic dishonesty affect those other than the students choosing to be dishonest?
What do you think the “moral” of this story is?
Assignment Guidelines:
Independent assignment – meaning you should not work with anyone to complete anypart of this assignment (including editing)
Paper should be at least 2 pages in length
Paper should be double spaced in 12 point font (Times New Roman or Calibri)
Place honor pledge at the end of the paper
Make sure you correctly cite the article (both in text and at the end)
ANSWER
The Decision on Academic Dishonesty: Supporting Christine Pelton’s Position
Introduction
The issue of academic dishonesty has recently gained attention due to a controversial incident involving Christine Pelton, a high school teacher, and the school board. This essay aims to provide an analysis of the situation and present arguments in support of Christine Pelton’s decision. Additionally, it will address the concept of intent in wrongdoing, the implications of a lax attitude towards cheating, the impact of academic dishonesty on others, and finally, draw a moral from this story.
Supporting Christine Pelton’s Decision
I support Christine Pelton’s decision to address academic dishonesty firmly and hold students accountable for their actions. Academic integrity is essential for fostering a fair and equitable learning environment. By upholding high standards and imposing consequences for cheating, Pelton sends a clear message about the importance of honesty and integrity in academic pursuits.
The Role of Intent
The comment made by one parent, “My child didn’t intend to cheat,” raises the question of whether wrongdoing can occur without intent. While intent is often a relevant factor in assessing moral responsibility, it does not excuse the act itself. Cheating, regardless of intent, undermines the principles of fairness and undermines the educational process. It is essential to emphasize the distinction between intention and the consequences of one’s actions, holding individuals accountable for their behavior.
The Dangerous Attitude Towards Cheating
The student’s statement that “cheating is almost not wrong” and “it’s any way that you can get an advantage” reflects a concerning attitude towards academic integrity. Such a perspective undermines the value of education, perpetuates a culture of dishonesty, and diminishes the importance of ethical conduct in various professions. If this mentality were present in critical fields like aviation or medicine, it would pose a significant risk to the safety and well-being of individuals.
Impacts on Others
Academic dishonesty affects more than just the students who engage in cheating. It undermines the credibility and reputation of educational institutions, erodes trust among students and faculty, and devalues the achievements of honest individuals. Furthermore, academic dishonesty can have long-term consequences, as individuals who cheat may lack the necessary skills and knowledge required in their future endeavors.
The Moral of the Story
The moral of this story lies in the importance of upholding integrity and ethics in all aspects of life, including education. It highlights the need for educators, parents, and society as a whole to instill values that prioritize honesty, hard work, and fairness. The consequences of academic dishonesty extend far beyond the classroom, shaping individuals’ characters and influencing their future paths.
Conclusion
Supporting Christine Pelton’s decision to address academic dishonesty demonstrates a commitment to upholding the values of integrity, fairness, and accountability in education. Understanding the implications of cheating, even without intent, emphasizes the need for a strong stance against academic dishonesty. By recognizing the broader impacts of such actions and drawing the appropriate moral lessons, we can strive for a society that values honesty and promotes ethical behavior in all endeavors.
