3008.1.2 : Ethical Leadership and Code of Ethics
The graduate identifies influences on ethical leadership and analyzes a code of ethics.
3008.1.3 : Policy and Program Development
The graduate develops policies, practices, procedures, and programs that foster organizational ethics and socially responsible behavior.
3008.1.5 : Legal and Regulatory Requirements
The graduate analyzes applicable legal and regulatory requirements to determine whether organizations meet legal responsibilities.
As a leader in your organization, it is vital that you are familiar with the laws that regulate your industry. Sparked by the dramatic corporate and accounting scandals of Enron, Arthur Andersen, Adelphia, and WorldCom, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was implemented in 2002 in an effort to restore confidence in the stock markets. Sarbanes-Oxley represents the most important securities legislation since the original federal securities laws of the 1930s as it increased governmental regulation and oversight of publicly traded companies and established protections for whistleblowers. The False Claims Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act provide a financial incentive for those who blow the whistle to report fraudulent activity within their organization.
In this task, you will select and analyze an established company’s code of ethics, analyze how an employee would raise an ethical concern within an organization, and consider current laws with respect to whistle-blowers.
You are an experienced ethics officer who has recently been hired by an established company. You have been tasked with analyzing the company’s current code of ethics and identifying areas in need of improvement.
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Prepare a report (suggested length of 6–8 pages) in which you do the following:
A. Choose a company’s code of ethics from the Web Links section below and analyze that company’s code of ethics by doing the following:
1. Analyze how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
2. Analyze how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of compliance with legal mandates.
a. Describe the ramifications for an organization when it is noncompliant with legal mandates.
b. Describe two legal or ethical safeguards the chosen company has in place or could put in place to prevent illegal or unethical acts.
3. Analyze how well the chosen company’s code of ethics facilitates the development of an ethical culture.
4. Explain how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the chosen company and provide three resources available to employees to use when raising an ethical concern.
a. Discuss which resource(s) you would most likely use to report an ethical concern.
B. Develop a policy that instructs employees on how to address unethical conduct observed at work by doing the following:
1. Discuss personal and organizational factors an employee would need to consider as a last resort before deciding to blow the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work.
2. Describe the internal and external reporting steps an employee should follow if the employee decides to blow the whistle.
C. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of whistle-blowers receiving payment from the government based on one of the following laws:
• False Claims Act
• Dodd–Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act
D. Analyze how the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have changed the way organizations operate.
1. Discuss three culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
E. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
A1:CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of CSR is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
A2:LEGAL MANDATE COMPLIANCE
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of compliance with legal mandates is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
A2A:IMPLICATIONS OF NONCOMPLIANCE
The description of the ramifications for an organization when it is noncompliant with legal mandates is logical, and the described ramifications are accurate and relevant to the legal mandates.
A2B:LEGAL OR ETHICAL SAFEGUARDS
The description of 2 legal or ethical safeguards in place at the chosen company to prevent illegal or unethical acts contains sufficient detail and is logical. Both safeguards described are relevant to the chosen company.
A3:DEVELOPMENT OF AN ETHICAL CULTURE
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics facilitates the development of an ethical culture is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
A4:RAISING AN ETHICAL CONCERN
The explanation of how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the chosen company is logical and includes all 3 resources available to employees and each resource will help the employee raise a concern. The ideas presented include key details.
The discussion of which resource(s) the candidate would most likely use to report an ethical concern is well supported and logical.
The discussion of personal and organizational factors that would need to be considered as a last resort before an employee blows the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
The description of the internal and external reporting steps the employee should follow if the employee decides to blow the whistle is logical and plausible.
C:ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF PAYING WHISTLE-BLOWERS
The analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of whistle-blowers receiving payment from the government is logical, contains key details, and specifically references 1 of the given laws.
D:IMPACT OF U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
The analysis of how the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have changed the way organizations operate contains key details and is logical.
The discussion is logical and accurately addresses 3 culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
Plagiarism Free Papers
All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.
All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.
A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.
Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.
Originality & Security
At Homework Valley, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.
24/7 Customer Support
Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
We work around the clock to see best customer experience.
Our prices are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.
Admission help & Client-Writer Contact
When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.
We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.
Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.