Your journal entry should be based ONLY on the three articles I am going to provide. The theme is “AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP: DOMESTIC AND GLOBAL”. The total number of words should be 450 words (for all the three articles together). Try to make a clear overall argument; better to start out with a strong main claim to help frame out the ideas. Make sure that everything that follows supports the argument.

QUESTION

(Great English is a must!! No grammar errors!)

(Read the articles and write a journal entry)

(Will provide all three articles in pdf format)

(450 words, APA Format)

——————————–

Subject of the paper: AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP: DOMESTIC AND GLOBAL

Requirement: Your journal entry should be based ONLY on the three articles I am going to provide. The theme is “AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP: DOMESTIC AND GLOBAL”. The total number of words should be 450 words (for all the three articles together). Try to make a clear overall argument; better to start out with a strong main claim to help frame out the ideas. Make sure that everything that follows supports the argument.

Other information: The following represents the articles, they are also attached to the message:

1. Bill George, Peter Sims, Andrew N. McLean, and Diana Mayer, “Discovering Your Authentic Leadership,” Harvard Business Review, reprint no. R0702H. February 2007

2. Herminia Ibarra, “The Authenticity Paradox,” Harvard Business Review no. R1501C-PDF-ENG. January 2015.

3. Sarah Cliffe, “Companies Don’t Go Global, People Do: An Interview With Andy Molinsky,”Harvard Business Review no. R1510E-PDF-ENG. October 2015.

ANSWER

Authentic Leadership: A Journal Entry

Introduction

Authentic leadership is a concept that has gained significant attention in both domestic and global contexts. It emphasizes the importance of leaders being true to themselves, their values, and their purpose. This journal entry will delve into the theme of “Authentic Leadership: Domestic and Global” based on the analysis of three key articles: “Discovering Your Authentic Leadership” by Bill George et al. (2007), “The Authenticity Paradox” by Herminia Ibarra (2015), and “Companies Don’t Go Global, People Do: An Interview With Andy Molinsky” by Sarah Cliffe (2015).

Main Claim

Authentic leadership is a vital approach that transcends geographical boundaries, enabling leaders to make a meaningful impact on individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.

Analysis

The first article by Bill George et al. (2007) explores the concept of authentic leadership and highlights the importance of self-awareness, genuine relationships, and a strong moral compass. It emphasizes that authentic leaders inspire and motivate others through their authenticity, ultimately creating a positive organizational culture. This article provides a foundation for understanding the essence of authentic leadership, which is applicable not only domestically but also in a global context.

Herminia Ibarra’s article (2015) delves into the authenticity paradox, which suggests that individuals may face challenges when striving to be authentic leaders. Ibarra argues that leaders need to adapt and evolve, even if it means deviating from their authentic selves, to navigate complex and diverse environments effectively. This article presents a thought-provoking perspective on the tension between authenticity and the demands of different contexts, shedding light on the nuances of authentic leadership on a global scale.

Sarah Cliffe’s interview with Andy Molinsky (2015) explores the notion that companies do not go global, but rather people do. The interview highlights the importance of cultural intelligence and adaptability for leaders venturing into global environments. Molinsky emphasizes that authentic leaders can bridge cultural gaps, understand local norms, and build trust across borders. This perspective aligns with the idea that authentic leadership is not limited to a specific geographical context but holds relevance and significance in a globalized world.

Conclusion

The analysis of the three articles on authentic leadership, within the context of “Authentic Leadership: Domestic and Global,” reinforces the notion that authentic leadership transcends borders. Authentic leaders, who are self-aware, build genuine relationships, and maintain a strong moral compass, can navigate diverse and complex environments effectively. While there may be challenges and paradoxes associated with authenticity, the ability to adapt and bridge cultural gaps is crucial for leaders in a globalized world. Authentic leadership is an important approach that empowers leaders to make a positive impact on individuals, organizations, and society at large, regardless of their geographical location.

Overall, these articles provide valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of authentic leadership and its significance in domestic and global contexts. The exploration of this theme contributes to a deeper understanding of the role and impact of authentic leadership, highlighting its relevance in contemporary leadership practices worldwide.